<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.fiercesarbox.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Jefferson Wells</title>
 <link>http://www.fiercesarbox.com/tags/jefferson-wells-0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Leverage your compliance efforts</title>
 <link>http://www.fiercesarbox.com/story/leverage-your-compliance-efforts/2007-11-13?utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;cmp-id=OTC-RSS-FS0</link>
 <description>
&lt;P&gt;The fact that companies can leverage their compliance initiatives toward strategic ends has become something of a management clich&amp;eacute;. I&#039;m surprised a Tom Peters-like book has not been produced. Hoping to make the concept more concrete, Jefferson Wells has studied the likes of Intel and Microsoft and has compiled a list of initiatives that can help companies leverage their Sarbanes Oxley initiatives. For many, this is still management-speak. For others, it is a call to arms. &lt;A href=&quot;http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20071107005890&amp;newsLang=en&quot;&gt;The list&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
 <comments>http://www.fiercesarbox.com/story/leverage-your-compliance-efforts/2007-11-13#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercesarbox.com/tags/jefferson-wells-0">Jefferson Wells</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 06:59:58 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1258 at http://www.fiercesarbox.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Case study: Boeing and Sarbanes-Oxley</title>
 <link>http://www.fiercesarbox.com/story/case-study-boeing-and-sarbanes-oxley/2007-07-24?utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_source=rss&amp;cmp-id=OTC-RSS-FS0</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;i&gt;Seattle&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt; P-I&lt;/i&gt; offers a rare look at what goes on inside a major company struggling to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley. This is a must-read &lt;a href=&quot;http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/323923_boeing17.html&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;. Rarely, is the pain reported so clearly. For all its wizardry with jets, the company has struggled with Sarbox. One employee described the process as &amp;quot;pure hell.&amp;quot; The same scenario is likely playing out at other companies. The company approached it like it was designing a new plane. But a deep rift between the finance and IT emerged and really hampered the process--something we&#039;ve been warning about. The finance side said the IT side was too rigid; the IT guys said the finance guys kept changing their minds. PricewaterhouseCoopers and Jefferson Wells apparently were at loggerheads often. Sound familiar? Really this is a great example of all that can go wrong. For all the effort and pain, there are still significant deficiencies--despite millions of dollars and a bevy of high-priced consultants--that the firm must grapple with. A good place to start would be with the compliance culture. Of course that is the hardest thing to change. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.fiercesarbox.com/story/case-study-boeing-and-sarbanes-oxley/2007-07-24#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercesarbox.com/tags/boeing">Boeing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercesarbox.com/tags/jefferson-wells-0">Jefferson Wells</category>
 <category domain="http://www.fiercesarbox.com/tags/pricewaterhousecoopers">PriceWaterhouseCoopers</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:59:59 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1156 at http://www.fiercesarbox.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
