FierceFinanceFierceFinanceITFierceSarbox   FierceCIO

Software-as-a-service and Sarbox: Good match?

You've probably heard a lot about the rise of software-as-a-service as a model that more companies, big and small, are embracing. Clearly, the notion of paying for software services, hosted elsewhere, on an as-you-go basis makes a lot of sense. Does it offer any advantages from a compliance standpoint? Treb Ryan, CEO of OpSource, noted at a recent conference the software-as-a-service model can be a big benefit in compliance if the service is already "compliant" from a Sarbanes-Oxley, or HIPAA or regulatory perspective. OpSource, which provides a platform for software companies to deliver services, notes that its service has completed a rigorous audit known as a type II SAS 70, which basically validates that the service is compliant. So the marketing point is that if software-as-a-service (SAS 70-audited anyway) for critical functions can still deliver the benefits and perhaps even save you a few compliance headaches. More software-as-a-service providers will likely start touting this.

For more:
- here's an article from Infoworld (scroll down for Ryan's comments)

More stories about HIPAA   compliance   standpoint   software companies   Sarbanes Oxley Technology  

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

What is 24 + 8?
To combat spam, please solve the math question above.